December 25, 2009

Spiritual Not Religious

WP Greet Box icon
Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to grab the RSS feed or subscribe via email to receive updates on this topic and many others!

Spiritual Scribbles

I’m growing less religious by the day. In fact, I think it would be safe to say that I want no part of any one particular religion. My growing hesitation concerning all things religious is not a product of some sort of bitter disdain for any one religion in particular, but rather my growing appreciation for our planet’s colorful compilation of religions and spiritual expressions. In fact, I think it would be proper to say that I am a spiritual person, but not religious. Yes, that might sound like an easy, modern, or perhaps even new age answer, but I assure you it is is not. It took me years to arrive at this conclusion and I can honestly say my arrival was anything but easy, modern, or new age. In fact, it has cost me plenty. It will cost you too, if you decide to chase it. It is worth the cost.

Right now, I am so captivated by life and living that I find most religious expressions unnecessary and at times even counter-productive. I have posted about this very phenomenon a few times in the course of the past few weeks.

I wrote a post titled “Ride On Two Wheels” wherein I revisited a theme I’ve been playing with concerning the inherently transient aspects of religion and our need to know when it (religion) should be discarded. Yes, I do think that religion’s greatest usefulness can only be found when its utter uselessness is realized (much like Christian pastors, to be honest). In other words, religion should be embraced – and it is – when we find ourselves in a position in life that lacks hope, vision, passion, and purpose. Most Christian converts, for example, convert when their lives are in the bottom of the proverbial bucket, so to speak, or if they start to age and begin worrying about their mortality. In these instances, religion serves a useful purpose, but it becomes a detriment if that usefulness is never realized and actualized in the setting of real life and living. If this realization and actualization never occur, and if the convert never moves beyond the most basic usefulness of their religious expression, then those people simply become emotional victims of their own self-inflicted objectification (it’s better to be objectified than deal with life, for some). Self-inflicted objectification, be it of a religious sort or otherwise, reduces the individual to a useless object that is used (i.e., a sense of purpose is fixed on something totally removed from personal or individual potential such as ideology, mission, church, a divine goal, etc.) and never permitted to live as a subject (Self-actualization, or realizing one’s full personal potential and living it). Any religion can reduce individuals to objects; a healthy spirituality will not only remind us that we are subjects, but also demand to be itself discarded so a life lived as subject can be authentically embraced.

I also wrote a post titled The Buddha’s Parable of the Raft. This post features a parable attributed to Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha) that not only speaks of the very human need to know when to let go of something when it’s usefulness has expired, but also, and perhaps more importantly, our need to understand that everything in fact has its own purpose and it is our responsibility to realize when that purpose has been served so that we can move forward for our own sakes and for the sake of that which has served our immediate purpose. A tool used beyond the purpose that has been invested into it is no longer a tool; it is blunt object used to beat, pound, or chop things into a position that suits our personal whims more so than the reality in which we live. This happens a lot in life, but it’s really observable in religion and religious expression.

I suppose what I’m trying to say can be summed up in one word: GROW!

So many of us embrace religion or a particular religious expression and never – ever – move again. We die there in that immutable place thinking that we have not only encountered exhaustive truth, but also have laid hold of it, permanently! The truth caught in our gripped fist is ours and it is not going anywhere! Truthfully, that is a most unfortunate place to live, if it can be called living at all.

Those of us restless souls who weave in and out of any religious expression that we encounter are often said to be weak. I would be quick – very quick – to disagree. I am convinced that if a complete picture of life and living can at all be glimpsed (not grasped) then the only snapshot of this available to us can be found in the journey taken by the other. It is only within our experiences of the other that we can truly see ourselves, and perhaps more importantly, what it is we are actually doing. This event may be called a lot of things by a lot of people who think they do not need such an experience, but “weak” is not one of them.

I have grown to so appreciate the journey of the other that I can no longer align myself with any one particular expression. Such alignment requires too much spiritual energy and verbal gymnastics to be considered personally edifying, in my humble opinion. Also, I honestly believe that if our generation’s spiritual needs are going to be authentically met, then we have to begin the hard work of writing our own story. Our world’s compilations of Sacred Literature are incredible examples of the universal human need to do just that … Sometime, hopefully soon, more of us will be courageous enough to actually take our great compilation of Sacred Literature seriously enough to actually begin living like the people who recorded it rather than simply appropriating their work and their journey.

Personally, my new year will be dedicated to doing just that … I’m also in a new church where all that I’ve talked about in the above is not only embraced, but is also celebrated! I also have a new job that gives me plenty of time to work on a few literary projects that have been on the back-burner for some time (including a children’s book based upon a myth my own children grew up hearing from me, a screenplay about life in Western PA, and a confessional memoir tentatively titled “SIX”). There is a lot more going on life that is so good, but I’ll spare you dear readers of those details. I guess what I’m trying to say as I close this post, is that none of these things happening in my life right now would be happening had I not realized that life and living is the point. I’m sure I would never had realized this truth had it not been for my time spent as a religious human being, but I do realize it now. I am not an object to be used, I’m a living, breathing human being who is finally realizing that the quest for full personal potential is a mark of spiritual maturity.

I thank you, religion, for pointing me towards this transformational truth, but now it’s time for you to be set aside. Your usefulness has run it’s course. Thanks for pointing me back towards the life that was always there for me to live during a time when I could not see it. I see it now. Bye.

Related posts:

Tags: health and spirituality

13 Responses to “Spiritual Not Religious”

  1. Bill Uhrich says:

    Merry Christmas, Shawn!

    I ‘d like to hear more about job, church…

    My best to your family,
    Bill

  2. Hi, Bill! You will be … :)

  3. [...] Spiritual Not Religious – Lo-Fi Tribe [...]

  4. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Yancey @YanceyG, Gentle Souls. Gentle Souls said: Spiritual Not Religious – Lo-Fi Tribe http://bit.ly/4FCtf1 [...]

  5. [...] This post was Twitted by omistic [...]

  6. What a wonderful story and realization.

    Thank you Shawn,
    Chris

  7. Jodi says:

    I love the saying, “I’m not religious, I love Jesus”.

  8. It’s a good saying, but, in my experience, most people who actually use that phrase are more religious than fundamentalists. Not saying that you, Jodi! Just saying …

  9. Greg says:

    Just read this one. I think the saddest thing you point out (because it is also true) is that when people are down, they embrace religion. I am drawn to those who are building spaces where those who are down, are embraced by those who are spiritual. Dogma, ritual, and conventions all have their place. But, they will never add up to the power of love lived out in the present tense. peace

  10. Matthew Kennel says:

    Shawn,
    First of all, congratulations on the new job. I hope that you and your family will flourish in the new year.

    I’m glad to see you wrestling with fundamental questions and recognizing the value in the religious pursuits of all human beings. These are questions that must be wrestled with – and far too few actually wrestle with them. You won’t mind, I hope, if I ask a simple question. You criticize, and rightly so, a religion that stops its adherents from reaching their full potential in daily living (my sister has commented to me that this aspect of IMG, the aspect of Christianity as a lifestyle, was one of the aspects that she appreciated the most). But, I wonder, if one is to simply drop religion, how does one deal with the question of death? We can immanentize eschatology all we want, but such an immanentized eschatology can never deal with this question adequately or remove it from human discourse. How, then, does a religionless conception deal with the question of death and its aftermath?

  11. Hi, Matthew! I don’t mind constructive questions at all! In fact, I thank you for asking!

    Given your comment above, I have to first ask you a question: Which eschatology are you emphasizing, Matthew? There are more than a few in the Bible, and they each are characterized by their own schematic, if you will. So, I have to ask, which one are you referencing, if any at all? Perhaps you are referencing an eschatology all your own, pieced together from all of those found in the texts in a cumulative sort of way?

  12. Greg says:

    If you will excuse the non-seminary approach; religions are human practices and they cannot answer the questions raised by death (except by proving better use of proprietary vernacular or logical progression of accepted theologies — but those do not guarantee what will happen). They make promises.

    But, as Vine Deloria pointed out in God is Red (defending his preference for the traditional beliefs of his own people and contemplating Oral Roberts’ sorry display of begging for funds to avoid being taken out of life by God), many of their supposed adherents behave as if they do not believe those promises when the chips are down.

    The only way to know who is right about what happens after death is to die. My question is, “Which one leads to a greater experience of the Divine now, in what we can know — religion or spirituality?”

    Big language aside, I experience far more of God living in the world that is, (often among people with no interest in religion, for many years among the children deemed incorrigible by society) than in religious rituals, or intellectual theological discussions. I place my chips for what works at death on what leads to the presence of God now.

    peace,
    Greg

  13. @Greg: Well said, brother. Religion becomes a barrier to growth if we hold onto it longer than it was meant to be held onto … I think religion can be good, if it is seen for what it is and is discarded when what it points towards is understood. Religion is a lot like our teen-aged years. That time in our lives was great, but not meant to be held onto indefinitely. :)

Leave a Reply